SALFORD MP Hazel Blears appeared on television brandishing a cheque to the taxman as she tried to rebuild her reputation following the expenses saga.
Ms Blears hit the headlines after leaked expense claims showed she accrued more than £20,000 per year in second-home allowances as the fall-out from revelations about MPs’ expenses centered on the conduct of the communities and local government secretary.
Ms Blears sent a cheque for £13,000 to the Inland Revenue after revelations she avoided paying capital gains tax on the sale of her London home, but maintains she had acted within the rules and the law.
The leaked expense claims also show that Ms Blears spent £850 on a TV and video and £651 on a mattress for her home in Salford in March 2004.
After selling her London property in August 2004, she claimed for two months living in London hotels - including claims for two Kit Kat Chunkies and a glass of wine.
Hazel said: "I’m really aware of how angry the public are about all this. I talked to my husband and although I have complied with all the rules and am not liable for the money, I decided that I wanted to pay what I would have done in capital gains tax.
"I put the cheque in the post in order to rebuild my relationship with the people of Salford."
Despite repaying the money, Ms Blears still insisted she had done nothing wrong and called for a review of the parliamentary expenses system.
She said: "I think the whole system is in disrepute and needs to be reformed top and bottom.
"When I became an MP my first home was in Salford, and when I became a minister the Fees Office said that I had to designate my flat in Kennington as my main home. The reason for this is an old archaic rule that had been in place for about 50 or 75 years.
"If you are a minister, they said that your main home has to be in London because you had to spend most of your time there.
"In 2004 they changed the rules to allow all members to designate which home was their main home."
Ms Blears also defended her claims for a glass of white wine and two Kit Kats from the mini-bar of a London hotel.
She said: "While I sold my flat in Kennington, I stayed in hotels and I even stayed in a friend’s house to save money because I didn’t have anywhere to live in London. The Kit Kat Chunky was what I had to eat after a day of meetings - I took it from the minibar and it was on the hotel bill which I submitted to the Fees Office.
"It wasn’t as if I’d deliberately claimed for a four-course meal. If people take the view that a Kit Kat Chunky is the basis of all this then they can, but the reality is that the life I lead does mean that I have to come home late and get something to eat. I didn’t look at that bill meticulously and I think it is fair to say that the system needs to be more meticulous."
See this week's Advertiser for more reaction ...

Sign up to the weekly
news
Most recent user comments 25 of 26
21/05/2009 at 14:28 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
21/05/2009 at 14:26 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
There are already three known local prospective parliamentary candidates (PPCs) for Salford and Eccles, any of whom would - by definition - serve as an anti-Hazel vote:
(1) Local Liberal Democrat Councillor for Claremont ward Norman Owen will be the Lib Dem candidate.
(2) Local man Robert Wakefield is already on public record as being UKIP's PPC for Salford and Eccles.
(3) Local man Richard Carvath [i.e. me] is already on public record as being an Independent PPC for Salford and Eccles.
The Conservatives and the BNP will also certainly contest Salford and Eccles but have yet to name their PPCs.
I can't speak for the other candidates, but speaking for myself I certainly see myself as a strong anti-corruption candidate, not least because as an Independent I am untainted by party politics and also because I have already made a binding commitment that if I am elected I will accept only a salary in line with the National Minimum Wage.
21/05/2009 at 11:33 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
20/05/2009 at 23:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
20/05/2009 at 15:35 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
20/05/2009 at 14:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
20/05/2009 at 14:13 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
20/05/2009 at 12:45 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Let's get a campaign going to get sleazebuster Martin Bell to stand against Ms Blears.
Salford would never elect a Tory, and I cannot see Norman Owens making much impression.
The Salford Labour Party don't seem to think that tax avoidance is a problem for our MP and Minister, so let's show them what we think.
20/05/2009 at 12:21 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
20/05/2009 at 06:14 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
“In the Name of God, Go” April 20, 1653 It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money; is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? is there one vice you do not possess? ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes? is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth? ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves become the greatest grievance. Your country therefore calls upon me to cleanse this Augean stable, by putting a final period to your iniquitous proceedings in this House; and which by God’s help, and the strength he has given me, I am now come to do; I command ye therefore, upon the peril of your lives, to depart immediately out of this place; go, get you out! Make haste! Ye venal slaves be gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!
19/05/2009 at 20:12 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
But I don't think Hazel Blears could ever repay the people of Salford and the UK for the political atrocities which she has inflicted upon us during the twelve years she's so far enjoyed riding the parliamentary gravy train.
19/05/2009 at 14:42 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
19/05/2009 at 11:21 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
18/05/2009 at 17:57 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
But on a more sreious note regaring this issue ..... HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU TRUST SOME ONE TO REPRESENT A COMMUNITY WHEN ALL THEY DO IS SEEK TO LINE THEIR OWN POCKETS FROM US THE TAXPAYERS ???????, AS MANY OTHERS HAVE SAID AND WILL NO DOUBT CONTINUE TO SAY ...... ITS HIGH TIME SHE WAS REPLACED FOR SOMEONE WHO REALLY WANTS TO DO GOOD FOR THE AREA !!!!!! GO NOW HAZEL BEFORE YOU BRING MORE DISREPUTE ON THE AREA !!!!!
18/05/2009 at 01:19 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
17/05/2009 at 18:18 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
However, it is important not to lose sight of how Salford's MP has promoted herself and her values in the past, and then make a comparison with the way she has conducted herself in relation to the Allowances issue.
Hazel Blears is the author of a paper "The Politics of Decency".
It was pubished in September 2004, just prior to Labour's successful campaign for relection for the 3rd term.
In this paper she refers to Modern Socialism being about ethics and the need to rebuild the basic values of decency in our society. She suggests that the behaviour of the individual has an effect on wider society.
She concludes that free-market individualism must be replaced by social values built on trust, interdependance and decency.
Has Ms Blears conducted herself strictly in accordance with these ideals?
Consider this: In March, 2004, Ms Blears stated that her second home was the property she owned in her Salford constituency, which she has owned with her husband since June, 1997.
The following month she changed her declaration and began claiming that a flat in Kennington, south London, was her second home. She started claiming £850 a month for the mortgage on the flat.
In August, 2004, she sold the flat for £200,000, making a profit of £45,000. No Capital Gains Tax was due because she had declared the flat as her Main residence for tax purposes, even though it was registered as her second home with the house of Commons Fees Office.
This practice is not in the spirit of the rules laid down in the Green Book Guide to Member's Allowances.
It would appear that the cheque she claims to have posted to H M Revenue and Customs cannot genuinely be offset against her profit, and just amounts to a publicity stunt (or worse).
She does not deserve the support of the Labour Party or the people of Salford.
17/05/2009 at 16:14 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
16/05/2009 at 23:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
16/05/2009 at 17:48 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
16/05/2009 at 14:47 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
If Ms Blears thinks that this cheque will recover her standing in Salford she is sadly mistaken. We have now seen clearly what makes her tick - greed and self interest. Totally unacceptable behaviour and morally bankrupt, but she shows no remorse at all.
It is time for Salfordians to collectively call for her resignation or deselection.
15/05/2009 at 19:47 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
15/05/2009 at 17:26 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
By declaring repeatedly that no capital gains tax was due, Ms Blears made it clear that her cheque was not actually for capital gains tax.
If HM Revenue & Customs actually cash her cheque (which they may not) all they can do with it is credit it against future tax due. In effect, all she has done is pre-pay the tax she will have to pay for next year!
This means that her gesture was actually worthless.
By repaying sums to the House of Commons Fee Office, at least the other exposed MPs had the decency to put their hands in their pockets in their attempts to rebuild their tattered reputations. Ms Blears has obtained the same PR benefits without actually returning a penny.
You have to admire the guile.
15/05/2009 at 16:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
15/05/2009 at 15:23 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
15/05/2009 at 15:15 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.