A CONTROVERSIAL new scheme, which provides people with the right to die in a medical emergency, is being piloted in Salford causing pro-life groups to brand it a ‘move towards legal suicide’.
In the first scheme of its kind in the UK, ‘Advanced Decision to Refuse Treatment’ (ADRT) cards can now be picked up from Swinton Library, instructing doctors not to treat a patient should they lose the capacity to make decisions, due to an accident or illness.
ADRTs already exist under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, for people who are terminally ill. The new cards will be available to all members of the public.
Josephine Quintavalle, a campaigner and founding member of the Pro-life Alliance, said: "It’s moving towards your legal right to suicide which is something that used to be completely illegal.
"It’s quite sad to think that you can now carry cards stating your right to die.
"It’s quite sinister that people are being encouraged to make these decisions now and carry these cards choosing the right to die.
"You have to wonder why public money is being spent on things like this.
"One of the problems about these decisions is that when you’re in the prime of your life you may see old or ill people and think you never want to be in the situation where your needing to be kept alive.
"However if you ask people who work with the terminally ill, they will tell you how valuable the last few days and last few moments of someone’s life are."
David Entwistle, manager of Salford’s mental health social work team, believes that the new scheme will allow people to make an ‘informed decision’.
He said: "This is a significant piece of legislation that we have worked hard to make tangible and easily accessible to people, to safeguard them in vulnerable situations.
"We’ve worked closely with partner agencies to get this right and feel we have created an innovative and practical solution that is simple and effective."
In order to opt into the scheme, people must fill out a card which would then be carried in their wallet or purse.
In the event of an emergency the card would then be used in conjunction with a more detailed statement left with a GP or loved one, stating which treatments are to be refused and in what circumstance.
Dr Steve Colgan, medical director for Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, who provide services throughout Salford believes the scheme will provide people with more control over their future.
He said: "When someone does become very unwell and no longer has the ability to make sound decisions about their welfare we want to ensure that they still have as much control over their future as possible.
"The Advanced Decision card gives patients that choice long before they are too unwell to make decisions themselves."
Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment cards can now picked up from Swinton Library.
A Salford Primary Care Trust spokeswoman said: "The new Mental Capacity Act (2005) allows people to make an ‘advance decision to refuse treatment’.
"The Act only became operational in April 2007 and therefore many people do not know about their right to make an advance decision to refuse treatment. An Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment Card has been produced by Salford’s Mental Capacity Act Implementation Group as an aid for people to inform others should they choose to make an ‘advance decision’.
"It is up to individuals to decide if they want to do this - they are entitled to do so and equally they are entitled to withdraw or alter it at any stage.
"The cards come with leaflets to explain to people what an advance decision to refuse treatment is, why they might want to make the decision, how they do it and other related issues.
"As we know this could be a difficult ethical issue for some people, we took advice from religious leaders from the Roman Catholic, Church of England, Muslim and Jewish faiths and have tried to be sensitive about where we have distributed the cards."

Sign up to the weekly
news
Most recent user comments 13 of 13
Tacit euthanasia by neglect is already going on in the UK in NHS hospitals and in care homes; I am opposed to this.
To be murdered by neglect and the omission of basic treatment and care - particularly to be murdered by starvation and/or dehydration - is an agonising and horrific death.
These Please-Murder-Me Cards make us all a lot less safe and so I will continue to oppose them and fight for the Right To Life.
5/10/2009 at 10:34 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
What right have you to remove these cards!!! You have obviously never had to watch someone die???
Whats the point of a meaningless sustained life?
People like you should find alternative employement- maybe working in guantanamo bay would be more your thing! At least there you could watch people being tortured to death- if this is more your thing.
I hope David Entwistle bars you from the Library and by the way- removal of those cards probably amounts to theft in your confession- i would like see if charges can be brought- if not then you should at least be barred!
4/10/2009 at 03:05 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
David Entwistle and all the others who made this card possible- you have my blessing and the blessing of countless thousands of others. You have taken away the pain of many and reduced the fear of thousands- well done!
4/10/2009 at 02:59 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Don't get him started on speed cameras either as he tends to off on one!
A plague of locusts on all yellow boxes!
5/06/2008 at 09:35 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Christianity is truth - not fairytale (and I think you'll find several billion people around the world that agree with me).
Christianity will come to the fore again in this nation when the UK collapses to its knees through disaster or conquest as a result of fifty years of secular humanist evil.
22/05/2008 at 17:02 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
How refreshing to be reminded exactly why the majority of people no longer find the fairytales you believe in relevant.
Outdated, irrelevant, and marginalised. Exactly how it should be.
22/05/2008 at 15:40 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I am right and you are wrong, absolutely no doubt about it.
Christianity is not merely my personal viewpoint, some imagination of Richard Carvath, but is based absolutely upon the authentic historical facts of the life of Jesus Christ as given in the Bible.
Furthermore in regard of the issue of ADRT Cards and euthanasia everything I've said - about the Dutch experience and the Nazi euthanasia programme for example - is the truth and there is no denying it.
My predictions of where ADRT Cards will quickly lead our society are well reasoned and based on precedent and a deep familiarity with the people and ideologies behind the push for euthanasia [though I could only give a brief overview in a previous comment or it'd get too long].
Bibles are being removed left, right and centre from hotels and hospitals all the time and not only by individuals; many public bodies such as hospital trusts now forbid Bibles because Christianity 'offends' against the postmodern secular humanist new order they seek to impose. I'd rather it didn't happen of course but it doesn't bother me; I'm used to opposition and persecution.
For the record I also regularly remove homosexual pervert propaganda from public buildings, abortion propaganda and so-called 'sex education' propaganda aimed at teenagers amongst other things and there are other people like me who do the same. Who knows how much misery and suffering we avert, how many lives we save?
I stand for life and all that is good; I oppose abortion, euthanasia, homosexuality, pornography, promiscuity etc - in short I oppose evil and death. Woe to those who call evil as good and good as evil.
22/05/2008 at 14:40 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
So don't try and make your personal view point sound like fact.
Finally, there are a group of people who remove bibles from hotel rooms whenever they come across them, would you be in support of that too, even if it is only symbolic...............?!
22/05/2008 at 13:00 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
In deliberately removing cards I did the right thing (though it was largely symbolic because of course more have been put out).
You talk about me removing choice from people but ADRT Cards are not about patient choice or people's rights - that's a propaganda lie.
ADRT Cards are about starting to establish a culture in which euthanasia is 'acceptable' and if we carry on down this road then before too much longer doctors will be routinely killing people without consent or even against their will - we're talking about state sanctioned murder by 'licenced to kill' doctors and nurses - and furthermore it won't just be in cases of terminal illnesses... it'll be for a wide range of medical trivialities.
As a society, once we say killing [by omission as at present, and probably in time by act] is a permissible 'solution' in one situation, then fairly soon killing will become the 'final solution' in a wide range of circumstances. Trust me on that... I know my history on abortion, eugenics and utilitarianism, as I know my history on many things. Mark my words... these cards are a very significant step towards state sanctioned murder of the elderly, the disabled and the vulnerable.
My actions are not selfish but selfless. I save life by my conduct. I urge all people to choose life because death is no choice at all.
If I might finish 'philosophically', we're all 'dead' anyway until we choose life. I'll give you a certificate to say that you are 'presently dead' if you like! Have a think about that one!
Choose life!
21/05/2008 at 22:49 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
The Salford pilot scheme of ADRT Cards is a PR propaganda campaign to con the public into embracing euthanasia. The cards have been called the 'Right to Die' Cards but that is very misleading as the cards are really about conning people into signing their own death warrant by agreeing to euthanasia (by omission). Euthanasia is not about the 'right to die' - but it is about giving doctors the 'right to kill' people. The 'Right to Die' will soon become the 'Duty to Die'. The 'Right to Die' is really about the 'Right to Kill'.
The propaganda tactic behind this pilot scheme is to present the cards as being all about patient choice and patient rights - which on the face of it sounds like a good thing - but it's a lie. The cards are about making euthanasia culturally acceptable by stealth because ultimately - directly or indirectly, officially or unofficially - the decision making power in the cases of vulnerable incapacitated people will gravitate very strongly away from such people and towards doctors. Euthanasia is not about patient choice or people's rights - it is about cutting costs to the NHS and about creating a eugenic society.
Euthanasia cannot be controlled in the straightforward manner this pilot scheme implies. The 'Death Warrant' Cards - as I prefer to refer to them - are wide open to abuses such as forgery or vulnerable people being manipulated into participation. People will be pressurised 'not to be a burden'. And some participants in the scheme will inevitably change their minds and yet die against their wishes because of administrative errors, clinical negligence or deliberate malpractice. It is easy for doctors and nurses to fabricate medical notes to cover their tracks if they are so minded to see somebody off sooner rather than later - especially so when vulnerable people are concerned.
People are not 'better off dead'. Most terminally ill people who express interest in early death are depressed but this state of mind does vary over time and such depression is eminently treatable. Furthermore the encouragement of euthanasia flies in the face of huge improvements in hospices and advances in palliative care in recent years. It should be remembered that the deprivation of food and water to hasten death inevitably causes prolonged suffering to the victim. Death from thirst and starvation is horrible, painful and slow.
Where is this pilot scheme leading British society? Well, 'voluntary' euthanasia inexorably leads to involuntary euthanasia (that is - murder!). If ADRT Cards become popular, in time the Government will bring in legislation which goes further and so the application of euthanasia will move away from terminal conditions and become a 'treatment option' - so to speak - for anything from depression to stress to loneliness to fear of impending disease or fear of decline - and of course become a convenient way to get rid of disabled people.
The Nazis ran a large, organised euthanasia programme to get rid of the disabled, the mentally ill, the elderly, those deemed to be 'idiots', infants with birth defects or congenital diseases such as Down's Syndrome and also people with medical conditions such as epilepsy, polio, schizophrenia, paralysis and Huntington's Disease. That's where we are heading if we carry on down this road.
When euthanasia was legalised in Holland in 1984 it quickly materialised that euthanasia could not be controlled. Safeguards could not be imposed or maintained. Doctors could easily circumvent the law once they were 'licenced to kill'.
In Holland today at least a thousand people (including children) are killed every year without their expressed consent and/or against their will. This is murder. It is impossible to know just how many people are being murdered by doctors in Holland every year because 'dead men tell no tales' and Dutch doctors doing the paperwork often don't bother to tell the authorities when they've given someone a lethal send-off.
Ironically in comparison to this ADRT Cards pilot scheme... in Holland the Dutch Patients Association now distributes a card to help protect people from being murdered by euthanasia; the card instructs: "...no treatment be administered with the intention to terminate life."
21/05/2008 at 16:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
21/05/2008 at 13:21 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
To reiterate the reaction of just one person amongst many who is horrified by these death cards, when I met with Lord David Alton last night his immediate response was, "There are enough people committing suicide in this country already without further encouraging the practice."
Lord Alton later condemned the scheme in an address to a meeting gathered at Salford Cathedral [which meeting was concerned with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill currently in the House of Commons]; Lord Alton noted the links between those people and organisations which are pushing to further liberalise the UK abortion laws and those seeking to introduce open euthanasia ( or so-called 'assisted suicide', which once introduced quickly becomes involuntary... the so-called 'right' to die quickly becomes the obligation to die).
9/05/2008 at 13:53 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I'd like to post some comments about euthanasia here but I don't have the time right now. Maybe another time.
Having met and corresponded with David Entwistle on several occasions, there is much which I would like to say about the public face promoting these death cards to the public, however - knowing that this website's editor could not risk the potential legalities of letting such comments through - I'll simply say people can get hold of me for further comment 'on the grapevine'.
8/05/2008 at 16:34 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.