Well, we've been waiting for over a month now for Char Williams and 'Comment is Free' pals to make the case for photographic-prostitution [i.e. pornography].

Since we're still waiting, I decided to contact Lucy Pinder herself [via her management agency] to see if she would like to comment on this thread in defence of her career as a photographic-prostitute.

We'll all just have to watch this space to see if Lucy decides to 'trade licks' of Licence Vs Liberty, Lust Vs Love and Holiness Vs Harlotry with me. But let's just hope and pray that she renounces prostitution, not least for her own sake.

   I was just coming out of a petrol station shop a couple of hours ago when who should I encounter but none other than Lucy Pinder herself! Let me explain... Lucy was prominently displayed on the front cover of the part-pornographic 'Nuts' magazine which was placed at unavoidable eye-level right by the exit door. It's sad she's still in that lifestyle.

I'm sure Lucy's an avid reader of the Salford Advertiser website so I'd like to extend to her an open invitation to come to Salford again to meet with the one who is truly the manliest man of all time. It would be a privilege to introduce Lucy to Him.

   I'm game for giving Lucy a go if she wants to hook up. In fact I'd be delighted to meet her and spend some time with her. I love Lucy (it's her sin I am against, not her). I wouldn't worry too much for me if Lucy and I did meet James. First of all she's only a baby of 25, isn't she? Secondly, I've had plenty of encounters with all sorts of 'interesting women'! I'm confident I could handle Lucy Pinder.

   With all due respect Richard I think our Ms Lucy may be beyond redemption. I do applaud your efforts though, if you can resist her obvious fleshy temptations. Who knows, armed with your drill bits, brut and bible you may lead her to the path of righteousness.

   I've just got a new pneumatic drill and so - given Miss. Pinder's power tool fetish - I'm having her round this Thursday to give it the once over. We're having tea and scones at four so if anybody would like to join us just drop me a line via the usual channels. I must say I'm thankful for Lucy's reassurance that she will NOT be taking her clothes off!... I don't know what it is but I've had a spate of misfortune in recent years in which on several occasions young women have variously started undressing before me or else made 'offers of an interesting nature'. I suspect it might be my 1970s Brut deodorant. There's nothing more manly than a bit of Brut.

And when Lucy comes I'll give her a good ticking off for her pornographic activities. I don't want to see her naked but I would in the future like to see her in the beauty of holiness. Lucy has the potential to be a very beautiful woman one day... and that would be a sight to behold indeed.

   I'm quite happy to continue posting on this website despite the fact that it does not accept everything I submit. I do not particularly care for the fact that this paper effectively has a monopoly on news provision in Salford but for the time being that is the reality. I'm a local person interested in the local news and so if I want to participate this is probably the best place to do so.

You'd probably be interested in the stuff I submit which doesn't get published - such as what I wrote about the civil partnership article currently on this website - but as I say it doesn't get past the censor. Ask yourself why when all my facts are correct and what I post is legal... could it be that the Salford Advertiser isn't the innocent apolitical local rag with no agenda that it claims?

I've previously been criticised on this website for 'grandstanding' and advised to take my talents to 'bigger' national websites. Now you're accusing me of 'hiding' on this website as though I can't face the heat in other forums! My 'enemies' can't have it both ways! I eat little argumentative scrotes like you for breakfast! You can come to me here if you want to 'take me on'.

This one's about pornography. If you've got something good to say about pornography then say it here and we'll have the debate here (if the website will allow me freedom of speech). I don't need to go to silly argument websites for those who argue for the sake of it because that's not what I'm doing. When I speak on moral issues like this one I know I'm right and I don't need to debate that fact. On this website I'm effectively standing up in the local community and speaking a simple truth to the people. Since you want to take me on - not the other way round (and I don't need to take you on because I'm unquestionably right) - you'll have to come to me because I'm not going to waste my time on silly websites such as you frequent.

I'm well aware that the presence of a Christian writer blowing away all the postmodern secular humanist orthodoxy that this paper stands for causes the paper and people like you distress but it's not my fault if I'm right and you're all wrong every time about moral issues. This paper has already proved to me that it doesn't allow true freedom of speech but it will keep up the pretence and allow me through with some posts. Eventually it'll probably ban me from the website because that's its best option: it can't beat me in a fair fight so it will just silence me - just like it does with an awful lot of voices and causes in Salford which never get any airtime in this paper.

Go and get your little army of left-wingers, atheists, wishy-washy liberals etcetera from arguing amongst each other on websites for fools and come and take me on here if you want to take me on. Me versus you and your army. You've got nothing to say when it comes to the big issues of the day - only Christianity has the solutions to today's problems. You've had your secular humanist experiment the last fifty years and the results speak for themselves that this country has gone to the dogs. Pornography and its consequences is just one example.

If you want to debate pornography we'll do it here. I promise you you'll be blown away though. I know that and you know that. And if I don't appear with a reply you'll know it's not because I'm running scared but that I've been censored by Stalin who won't allow the truth through.

   I am saddened to see the Salford Advertiser being dictated to by advertising by running a feature that sends such an outdated message to young readers. Reinforcing macho male stereotypes alienates and discourages students from working hard when being a builder is presented as so aspirational etc etc.

See Richard, you can write any old tosh about anything if you want. Why not bang your drum of irrelevance on Comment Is Free? Scared someone might actually read it?

GO ON JASE!

   I am saddened to see the Salford Advertiser condoning pornography by publishing a photograph of Lucy Pinder, referring to her as a "page three glamour girl" and captioning the photo with the pathetic innuendo "What a tool: Lucy checks out Jason's drill." Pornography is prostitution-by-proxy and Lucy Pinder should be properly described not as a "glamour girl" but as a photographic-prostitute. The harmful and destructive effects of pornography in society cannot be overstated and it is sad to see a Guardian Group newspaper pandering and playing up to pornographic culture. I hope the Salford Advertiser will at least admit its hypocrisy the next time it reports a sexual crime that was facilitated or motivated by pornography.